Squares and Square Roots | IT

Question 27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution

We will take three common primitive Pythagorean triples, generate five scaled versions for each, and then check if these new triples are primitive. A Pythagorean triple (a,b,c)(a, b, c) is a set of three positive integers that satisfy the equation a2+b2=c2a^2 + b^2 = c^2. A primitive Pythagorean triple has no common factors other than 1. This means their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1. We will use the primitive triples (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), and (8, 15, 17).

Step 1 — Scaled Versions for (3, 4, 5)

The triple (3, 4, 5) is primitive because the greatest common divisor of 3, 4, and 5 is 1. Let us generate 5 scaled versions by multiplying each number by an integer kk. We will use k=2,3,4,5,6k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

For k=2k=2: The scaled triple is (2×3,2×4,2×5)(2 \times 3, 2 \times 4, 2 \times 5). =(6,8,10)= (6, 8, 10) The common factors of 6, 8, and 10 are 1 and 2. The greatest common divisor (GCD) is 2. Since the GCD is 2 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=3k=3: The scaled triple is (3×3,3×4,3×5)(3 \times 3, 3 \times 4, 3 \times 5). =(9,12,15)= (9, 12, 15) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 9, 12, and 15 is 3. Since the GCD is 3 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=4k=4: The scaled triple is (4×3,4×4,4×5)(4 \times 3, 4 \times 4, 4 \times 5). =(12,16,20)= (12, 16, 20) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 12, 16, and 20 is 4. Since the GCD is 4 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=5k=5: The scaled triple is (5×3,5×4,5×5)(5 \times 3, 5 \times 4, 5 \times 5). =(15,20,25)= (15, 20, 25) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 15, 20, and 25 is 5. Since the GCD is 5 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=6k=6: The scaled triple is (6×3,6×4,6×5)(6 \times 3, 6 \times 4, 6 \times 5). =(18,24,30)= (18, 24, 30) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 18, 24, and 30 is 6. Since the GCD is 6 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

Step 2 — Scaled Versions for (5, 12, 13)

The triple (5, 12, 13) is primitive because the greatest common divisor of 5, 12, and 13 is 1. Let us generate 5 scaled versions using k=2,3,4,5,6k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

For k=2k=2: The scaled triple is (2×5,2×12,2×13)(2 \times 5, 2 \times 12, 2 \times 13). =(10,24,26)= (10, 24, 26) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 10, 24, and 26 is 2. Since the GCD is 2 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=3k=3: The scaled triple is (3×5,3×12,3×13)(3 \times 5, 3 \times 12, 3 \times 13). =(15,36,39)= (15, 36, 39) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 15, 36, and 39 is 3. Since the GCD is 3 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=4k=4: The scaled triple is (4×5,4×12,4×13)(4 \times 5, 4 \times 12, 4 \times 13). =(20,48,52)= (20, 48, 52) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 20, 48, and 52 is 4. Since the GCD is 4 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=5k=5: The scaled triple is (5×5,5×12,5×13)(5 \times 5, 5 \times 12, 5 \times 13). =(25,60,65)= (25, 60, 65) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 25, 60, and 65 is 5. Since the GCD is 5 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=6k=6: The scaled triple is (6×5,6×12,6×13)(6 \times 5, 6 \times 12, 6 \times 13). =(30,72,78)= (30, 72, 78) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 30, 72, and 78 is 6. Since the GCD is 6 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

Step 3 — Scaled Versions for (8, 15, 17)

The triple (8, 15, 17) is primitive because the greatest common divisor of 8, 15, and 17 is 1. Let us generate 5 scaled versions using k=2,3,4,5,6k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

For k=2k=2: The scaled triple is (2×8,2×15,2×17)(2 \times 8, 2 \times 15, 2 \times 17). =(16,30,34)= (16, 30, 34) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 16, 30, and 34 is 2. Since the GCD is 2 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=3k=3: The scaled triple is (3×8,3×15,3×17)(3 \times 8, 3 \times 15, 3 \times 17). =(24,45,51)= (24, 45, 51) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 24, 45, and 51 is 3. Since the GCD is 3 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=4k=4: The scaled triple is (4×8,4×15,4×17)(4 \times 8, 4 \times 15, 4 \times 17). =(32,60,68)= (32, 60, 68) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 32, 60, and 68 is 4. Since the GCD is 4 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=5k=5: The scaled triple is (5×8,5×15,5×17)(5 \times 8, 5 \times 15, 5 \times 17). =(40,75,85)= (40, 75, 85) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 40, 75, and 85 is 5. Since the GCD is 5 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

For k=6k=6: The scaled triple is (6×8,6×15,6×17)(6 \times 8, 6 \times 15, 6 \times 17). =(48,90,102)= (48, 90, 102) The greatest common divisor (GCD) of 48, 90, and 102 is 6. Since the GCD is 6 (not 1), this triple is not primitive.

Answer

(i) For the primitive triple (3, 4, 5): The 5 scaled versions are (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20), (15, 20, 25), and (18, 24, 30). None of these scaled versions are primitive. (ii) For the primitive triple (5, 12, 13): The 5 scaled versions are (10, 24, 26), (15, 36, 39), (20, 48, 52), (25, 60, 65), and (30, 72, 78). None of these scaled versions are primitive. (iii) For the primitive triple (8, 15, 17): The 5 scaled versions are (16, 30, 34), (24, 45, 51), (32, 60, 68), (40, 75, 85), and (48, 90, 102). None of these scaled versions are primitive.

More questions in IT

Q1

How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?

Q2

Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?

In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.

Q3

Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?

[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]

Q4

Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.

Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

Q5

Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?

Q6

Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?

Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:

Q7

Why is PQRS a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?

Explain by connecting QS and PR, finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.

Q8

Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.

Q9

What is the value of 2\sqrt{2}?

Q10

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 1?

Q11

Is 2\sqrt{2} less than or greater than 2?

Q12

Can we find closer bounds for 2\sqrt{2}?

Q13

Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?

If there is such a terminating decimal starting with 1.414... whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if 2\sqrt{2} is of the form 1.414...4, then its square will be of the form—

Q14

Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.

Q15

What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?

Q16

Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?

Q17

Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?

Q19

Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.

Q20

List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.

Q21

Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?

Q22

Is (30, 40, 50) a Baudhāyana triple?

Is (300, 400, 500) a Baudhāyana triple?

Q23

Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20).

Q. Do you see any pattern among them?

Q24

Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of (3, 4, 5) by a certain positive integer.

Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?

Q25

Context: Conjecture: (3k, 4k, 5k) is a Baudhāyana triple, where k is any positive integer.

Q. Is this true?

Q26

Is (5,12,13)(5, 12, 13) a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20?

Q27

Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?

Q28

If (a,b,c)(a, b, c) is non-primitive, and the integers have ff — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is (af,bf,cf)\left(\frac{a}{f}, \frac{b}{f}, \frac{c}{f}\right) a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for (9,12,15)(9, 12, 15). Justify this statement.

← Back to Squares and Square Roots