Divisibility and Multiples | FIO

Question 20

Sreelatha says, "I have a number that is divisible by 9. If I reverse its digits, it will still be divisible by 9".

(i) Examine if her conjecture is true for any multiple of 9.

(ii) Are any other digit shuffles possible such that the number formed is still a multiple of 9?

Check your answer with HomiSolve it yourself, then let Homi check your steps and spot mistakes.
Solution

The divisibility rule for 9 states that a number is divisible by 9 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9.

Step 1 — The Divisibility Rule for 9 Let us first understand the divisibility rule for 9. A number is divisible by 9 if its digit sum is divisible by 9. For example, consider the number 45. The sum of its digits is: 4+54 + 5 =9= 9 Since 9 is divisible by 9, 45 is also divisible by 9. Another example is 108. The sum of its digits is: 1+0+81 + 0 + 8 =9= 9 Since 9 is divisible by 9, 108 is also divisible by 9.

Step 2 — Examining Sreelatha's Conjecture Sreelatha says reversing digits keeps a multiple of 9 divisible by 9. Let us take any number NN. Let NN be a multiple of 9. Let its digits be dk,dk1,...,d1,d0d_k, d_{k-1}, ..., d_1, d_0. The number NN can be written as: N=dk10k+dk110k1+...+d110+d0N = d_k \cdot 10^k + d_{k-1} \cdot 10^{k-1} + ... + d_1 \cdot 10 + d_0 The sum of its digits is S=dk+dk1+...+d1+d0S = d_k + d_{k-1} + ... + d_1 + d_0. Since NN is divisible by 9, SS must be divisible by 9. Now, let us reverse the digits of NN. This forms a new number, let's call it NN'. The digits of NN' are d0,d1,...,dk1,dkd_0, d_1, ..., d_{k-1}, d_k. The number NN' can be written as: N=d010k+d110k1+...+dk110+dkN' = d_0 \cdot 10^k + d_1 \cdot 10^{k-1} + ... + d_{k-1} \cdot 10 + d_k The sum of the digits of NN' is S=d0+d1+...+dk1+dkS' = d_0 + d_1 + ... + d_{k-1} + d_k. We can see that SS' is exactly the same as SS. Since SS is divisible by 9, SS' must also be divisible by 9. Therefore, NN' (with reversed digits) must also be divisible by 9. Sreelatha's conjecture is true.

Let's use an example to make this clear. Consider the number 126\mathbf{126}. The sum of its digits is: 1+2+61 + 2 + 6 =9= \mathbf{9} Since 9 is divisible by 9, 126 is divisible by 9 (126=9×14126 = 9 \times 14). Now, let us reverse its digits. The new number formed is 621\mathbf{621}. The sum of its digits is: 6+2+16 + 2 + 1 =9= \mathbf{9} Since 9 is divisible by 9, 621 is divisible by 9 (621=9×69621 = 9 \times 69). This example confirms our finding.

Sreelatha’s conjecture is true.\boxed{\text{Sreelatha's conjecture is true.}}

Diagram 1

Step 3 — Other Digit Shuffles A digit shuffle means rearranging a number's digits. For example, for 126, we can get 216, 162, 612. When we shuffle digits, the actual digits do not change. Only their positions change. This means the sum of the digits remains the same. Let the original number be NN. Its sum of digits is SS. If NN is a multiple of 9, then SS is divisible by 9. Any number formed by shuffling NN's digits will have sum SS. Since SS is divisible by 9, the shuffled number is also divisible by 9. So, yes, any digit shuffle forms a multiple of 9.

Let's use an example. Consider the number 126\mathbf{126} again. Its sum of digits is: 1+2+61 + 2 + 6 =9= \mathbf{9} We know 126 is divisible by 9. Let us shuffle its digits to form 261\mathbf{261}. The sum of its digits is: 2+6+12 + 6 + 1 =9= \mathbf{9} Since 9 is divisible by 9, 261 is divisible by 9 (261=9×29261 = 9 \times 29). Another shuffle: 612\mathbf{612}. The sum of its digits is: 6+1+26 + 1 + 2 =9= \mathbf{9} Since 9 is divisible by 9, 612 is divisible by 9 (612=9×68612 = 9 \times 68). These examples show that any shuffle works.

Yes, any digit shuffle forms a multiple of 9.\boxed{\text{Yes, any digit shuffle forms a multiple of 9.}}

Answer

(i) Sreelatha's conjecture is true. Reversing digits does not change their sum. A number is divisible by 9 if its digit sum is divisible by 9. (ii) Yes, any other digit shuffle is possible. Any rearrangement of digits keeps the sum of the digits the same. If the original sum was divisible by 9, the new sum will also be divisible by 9.

More questions in FIO

Q1

The sum of four consecutive numbers is 34. What are these numbers?

Q2

Suppose pp is the greatest of five consecutive numbers. Describe the other four numbers in terms of pp.

Q3

For each statement below, determine whether it is always true, sometimes true, or never true. Explain your answer. Mention examples and non-examples as appropriate. Justify your claim using algebra.

(i) The sum of two even numbers is a multiple of 3.

(ii) If a number is not divisible by 18, then it is also not divisible by 9.

(iii) If two numbers are not divisible by 6, then their sum is not divisible by 6.

(iv) The sum of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 9 is a multiple of 3.

(v) The sum of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 3 is a multiple of 9.

Q4

Find a few numbers that leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 3 and a remainder of 2 when divided by 4. Write an algebraic expression to describe all such numbers.

Q5

“I hold some pebbles, not too many, When I group them in 3’s, one stays with me. Try pairing them up — it simply won’t do, A stubborn odd pebble remains in my view. Group them by 5, yet one’s still around, But grouping by seven, perfection is found. More than one hundred would be far too bold, Can you tell me the number of pebbles I hold?”

Q6

Tathagat has written several numbers that leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 6. He claims, “If you add any three such numbers, the sum will always be a multiple of 6.” Is Tathagat’s claim true?

Q7

When divided by 7, the number 661 leaves a remainder of 3, and 4779 leaves a remainder of 5. Without calculating, can you say what remainders the following expressions will leave when divided by 7? Show the solution both algebraically and visually.

(i) 4779 + 661

(ii) 4779 - 661

Q8

Find a number that leaves a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, a remainder of 3 when divided by 4, and a remainder of 4 when divided by 5. What is the smallest such number? Can you give a simple explanation of why it is the smallest?

Q9

Find, without dividing, whether the following numbers are divisible by 9.

(i) 123 (ii) 405 (iii) 8888 (iv) 93547 (v) 358095

Q10

Find the smallest multiple of 9 with no odd digits.

Q11

Find the multiple of 9 that is closest to the number 6000.

Q12

How many multiples of 9 are there between the numbers 4300 and 4400?

Q13

The digital root of an 8-digit number is 5. What will be the digital root of 10 more than that number?

Q14

Write any number. Generate a sequence of numbers by repeatedly adding 11. What would be the digital roots of this sequence of numbers? Share your observations.

Q15

What will be the digital root of the number 9a+36b+139a + 36b + 13?

Q16

Make conjectures by examining if there are any patterns or relations between (i) the parity of a number and its digital root. (ii) the digital root of a number and the remainder obtained when the number is divided by 3 or 9.

Q17

If 31z5 is a multiple of 9, where z is a digit, what is the value of z? Explain why there are two answers to this problem.

Q18

"I take a number that leaves a remainder of 8 when divided by 12. I take another number which is 4 short of a multiple of 12. Their sum will always be a multiple of 8", claims Snehal. Examine his claim and justify your conclusion.

Q19

When is the sum of two multiples of 3, a multiple of 6 and when is it not? Explain the different possible cases, and generalise the pattern.

Q20

Sreelatha says, "I have a number that is divisible by 9. If I reverse its digits, it will still be divisible by 9".

(i) Examine if her conjecture is true for any multiple of 9.

(ii) Are any other digit shuffles possible such that the number formed is still a multiple of 9?

Q21

If 48a23b is a multiple of 18, list all possible pairs of values for a and b.

Q22

If 3p7q83p7q8 is divisible by 44, list all possible pairs of values for pp and qq.

Q23

Find three consecutive numbers such that the first number is a multiple of 2, the second number is a multiple of 3, and the third number is a multiple of 4.

Are there more such numbers? How often do they occur?

Q24

Write five multiples of 36 between 45,000 and 47,000. Share your approach with the class.

Q25

The middle number in the sequence of 5 consecutive even numbers is 5p5p. Express the other four numbers in sequence in terms of pp.

Q26

Write a 6-digit number that it is divisible by 15, such that when the digits are reversed, it is divisible by 6.

Q27

Deepak claims, "There are some multiples of 11 which, when doubled, are still multiples of 11. But other multiples of 11 don't remain multiples of 11 when doubled". Examine if his conjecture is true; explain your conclusion.

Q28

Determine whether the statements below are 'Always True', 'Sometimes True', or 'Never True'. Explain your reasoning.

(i) The product of a multiple of 6 and a multiple of 3 is a multiple of 9. (ii) The sum of three consecutive even numbers will be divisible by 6. (iii) If abcdefabcdef is a multiple of 6, then badcefbadcef will be a multiple of 6. (iv) 8(7b3)4(11b+1)8 (7b - 3) - 4 (11b + 1) is a multiple of 12.

Q29

Choose any 3 numbers. When is their sum divisible by 3? Explore all possible cases and generalise.

Q30

Is the product of two consecutive integers always multiple of 2? Why? What about the product of these consecutive integers? Is it always a multiple of 6? Why or why not? What can you say about the product of 4 consecutive integers? What about the product of five consecutive integers?

Q31

Solve the cryptarithms —

(i) EF×E=GGG\text{EF} \times \text{E} = \text{GGG} (ii) WOW×5=MEOW\text{WOW} \times 5 = \text{MEOW}

Q32

Which of the following Venn diagrams captures the relationship between the multiples of 4, 8, and 32?

← Back to Divisibility and Multiples